Toallitas húmedas de algodón 100 % orgánico para bebé con Hydra Vitamin B5™

The solution is purified water preserved with hydroxyacetophenone, caprylyl glycol and ethylhexylglycerin — none of the methylisothiazolinone, DMDM hydantoin or bronopol this axis exists to catch — with panthenol, citric acid and tetrasodium EDTA making up the remainder, and the whole list is published. EWG's scientists reviewed and verified that formulation, and when independent consumer testers flagged hydroxyacetophenone and tetrasodium EDTA the brand confirmed both are used at low levels within established safety margins.

Independent laboratory testing of Parasol's pure-water wipe for 30 PFAS compounds using an EPA drinking-water method detected none, but that is the brand's other wipe rather than this organic cotton one. The published PFAS programme — more than 60 compounds across two finished-product tests to EN 17681-1:2025 and OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 Method 9, with pass results listed compound by compound — is written for the diaper line, and no PFAS result is published for these cotton wipes.

There is no alcohol and no fragrance anywhere in the eight-ingredient formula. The wipes are carried at retail with alcohol-free, hypoallergenic and water-based stated in the retailer's own product data, and EWG's scientists reviewed and verified the full formulation, which requires every ingredient to be disclosed.

The eight-ingredient formula contains no fragrance, no dye and no lotion, and fragrance, dyes and lotions are each named separately in the free-from list rather than bundled under "unscented". EWG's scientists reviewed the complete formulation — a review that requires every ingredient, including any fragrance component, to be disclosed — and these wipes carry EWG Verified status.

We queried the complete CPSC recall corpus — 9,944 records spanning June 1973 to August 2026 — and Parasol Co appears nowhere in it, in any role, at any date. The same corpus contains 32 diaper records, 86 pacifier records and 1,470 toy records, so this product class is covered and the clean result reflects the brand's genuine absence rather than a failed search.

These wipes hold EWG Verified status, granted after EWG's scientists screened the complete disclosed formulation against their own ingredient criteria, and the verification is listed publicly against this product. GOTS, OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 and a Dermatest "Excellent" rating for sensitive skin are also asserted for the finished wipe, with no licence numbers published for those three.

The complete solution list is published — water, dipropylene glycol, hydroxyacetophenone, caprylyl glycol, ethylhexylglycerin, panthenol, citric acid and tetrasodium EDTA — alongside the wipe material, 100% certified organic cotton. Independent consumer testers who asked the brand for the current formula were given a full list that matches the published one, and EWG Verified status requires every ingredient to be disclosed.

The cloth is 100% certified organic cotton with no synthetic fibres and no stain- or water-repellent finish, and it is asserted as both GOTS certified and OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 certified; independent non-toxic baby-care editors describe the substrate the same way. Licence numbers for the GOTS and OEKO-TEX certificates are not published.

The finished wipes carry the Dermatest "Excellent" rating for sensitive skin from that independent German dermatological institute, alongside dermatologist-tested and hypoallergenic claims, and independent baby-care editors report the same Dermatest rating for this product. Across the 20 customer reviews we read there were no rash or irritation complaints, and several parents said they moved to these wipes after a bad diaper rash.

When independent consumer testers pressed Parasol on two ingredients in this formula, the brand supplied an updated full ingredient list and confirmed both are used at low levels within established safety margins, and that list matches what is published for these wipes. The manufacturing country and the cotton supplier for these wipes are not published.