Bálsamo orgánico para pañalitis

The balm discloses its active approach clearly but does not use zinc oxide at all, relying instead on shea butter, beeswax and herbal extracts like calendula and St. John's Wort, so no barrier-active concentration or particle-size disclosure applies.

The published ingredient list contains no parabens, formaldehyde releasers or antibacterials, and no artificial fragrance and no synthetic preservatives company-wide; however, the balm does contain added lavender and tea tree essential oils, an undisclosed-fragrance-type ingredient this criterion also screens for.

The balm is marketed as free of artificial fragrance, but it is formulated with organic lavender and tea tree essential oils and sold under a scent name of 'Herbal,' so the product is actively scented despite the fragrance-free-adjacent framing. No lotion-free claim is made either.

We queried the CPSC public recall database across its full corpus (1973-2026) and found no record naming this brand in any role. The search covers diaper, crib, stroller and other baby-product categories with confirmed hits in those classes, showing the null result reflects a genuinely clean history rather than a coverage gap.

This diaper balm carries the EWG Verified mark, confirmed as independently screened against EWG's ingredient exclusion list. The balm is also Certified Organic by Oregon Tilth under USDA standards.

This diaper balm holds the EWG Verified mark, resolvable on EWG's own product-specific Skin Deep listing, confirming the formula was screened against EWG's health-concern ingredient database.

The balm's full INCI is published with 10 named ingredients, well under the 15-ingredient threshold, and the essential oils used for scent are individually named (lavender, tea tree) rather than hidden behind a single 'fragrance' entry.

The full ingredient list names each botanical oil, butter and extract in the formula rather than grouping them under vague marketing terms. This is a component-level breakdown for the finished diaper balm itself, not a summary claim.

The balm is dermatologist tested and pediatrician tested for irritation, but no testing institute, rating scale or published result is named alongside that claim.

The full ingredient list is published, but country of manufacture and any warranty or remedy terms for this topical product are not stated anywhere we found, and an independent review found ingredient transparency on the brand's own site limited.